There is a war going on right now for the preserved words of God in Spanish.

New Bibles and ‘science’ both have something in common... they keep changing! But there is something that doesn’t change.

Author David W. Daniels shares a true story from one of his books that illustrates what happens when we don't teach our children how to understand some of the unfamiliar words in the King James Bible. Don't settle for a modern corruption of what God actually said!

Did the Catholic Church give us the Bible? Can the pope really change it if he wants to?

A small sampling of verse comparisons between the KJV and NIV.

How the American Bible Society tried to fix a serious problem with a “band-aid.” It didn’t work.

Bible societies considered dangerous, like socialism and communism.

Why are people so sloppy about the very words of God? The Creator and Sustainer of the universe has lowered Himself to give us His rules and regulations, His principles and promises, His blessings and cursings. They are all there in one holy Book. The King James Bible.

Any bible but the KJV...

Are all Reina-Valeras equal, or are some better than others?

There has been a trend for a number of years to move remove faith in God's promise to preserve His Word.

Video transcript - If God preserved His words in some form, does He need to do it in that form again? If He preserved His words in English in the KJV, does He need to retranslate it every few years?

Video transcript - What should you do if your church moves away from the King James Bible? Should you leave?

Is it possible one of the two pillars supporting the modern, billion-dollar Bible industry is a counterfeit?

God promised to preserve his WORDS, not just his ideas. See how clear he made that.

What if there really ARE mistakes in the King James Bible?

HIstory shows that God revealed Himself to man in one language at a time. Those were then translated. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

One third of the nations in the world speak English either as a first or second language. God has decided to put His precious words for us in one language for both the Old and New Testaments. And He did this around 1611. God placed His riches into this language which has become universal.

Opponents of the King James Version like to say that there is an error in the text because Jesus' words "For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory forever. Amen" are found in Matthew but not in Luke.

Video transcript - Is being King James Only a crazy, extreme position? How should you handle people's scorn?

Everyone says only the "original autographs" were inspired. So why didn't God preserve them?

Answer to the charge

Aren't there archaic words in the Bible needing modern translation?

"Does the AV Bible (King James Version) contain archaic words? Certainly," says author Laurance Vance in his recent book, "Archaic Words and the Authorized Version."

Look what changes when you trust the KJV - your 'attitude' and your 'confidence.'

Don't let Modern Bible publishers fool you with their con game.

Rather than hard times driving Americans to the Bible, it appears that they are moving away from it at a faster rate.

Description of the texts used to bring us the Bible. Excerpted from "Understandable History of the Bible" by Samuel C. Gipp.

Dr. Frank Logsdon, project member of the translation committee for the New American Standard Version (NASB), has denounced his work on that Bible and urged all Christians to return to the Authorized Version, commonly known as the King James Bible.

Chick's stand for the King James Version as the preserved Words of God created a barrage of outrage as well as legitimate inquiries.

Are there good reasons why we should be concerned about the proliferation of Bible versions, or is it "much ado about nothing?"

Author David W. Daniels Tells How the NASB Influenced Him in Bible College.

After deciding that the King James Bible is the only perfectly preserved Word of God, what do you do with the old English words which you don't understand?

The Boy and Girls Scouts organizations used to be dependable help for parents raising children. But now that both groups accept openly homosexual leaders, abuse of these children is becoming rampant. The children are the target of these groups.

What happens when a pastor reads the Bible, but a child finds his own Bible says something different? The result does not build faith.

The Bible contains some quotations that are actually translations into Hebrew or Greek from other languages. Are they inspired Scripture? From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp copyright 1989. Reproduced by permission.

You won’t believe what these Seminary professors taught about the Bible! Would you want them destroying the faith of your son or daughter?

I know no person who gauges Christianity (salvation, I mean) by which Bible he reads.

You can be saved through other versions, but you will never be a threat to the devil by growing.

15 Bibles? You're going to have "interpretations" - people's private commentaries - not "translations."

People argued that the last part of the Gospel of Mark should be removed since it’s not in miniscule 2427, believed to be the oldest. Then scientific evidence proved it was a hoax.

There are two kinds of Bible scholars: the scholars of faith and the scholars of doubt. Which one will YOU trust?

When someone says to you, "the Bible is just a bunch of legends put together decades or centuries later," he is not aware of the facts.

The new NIV Bible translation, the TNIV, has finally gotten Bible scholars' attention to God's words.

From 'Understandable History of the Bible' by Samuel C. Gipp - How the Roman Catholic Church fought against the Authorized Text.

Meet the men whose disbelief compelled them to change the Bible - Westcott and Hort. See the heresy in their own words, and why they were determined to change the text of the Scriptures. From Gipp's "Understandable History of the Bible."

Ezra was presented with the perfect opportunity to update the Bible. Rather, he did what every faithful pastor should be doing.

The Vatican desperately needs the Apocrypha in the Bible to support some of her doctrine. How are modern Bibles increasingly slanted to support Rome's pagan dogmas?

Is your bible the perfect word of God?

Excerpt from chapter 9 of "Understandable History of the Bible" by Samuel C. Gipp.

First they said the text was "permanent." Now they are saying they need to change it... again.

Whether to use the King James or a modern Bible depends upon a simple decision. It boils down to one basic choice - do you believe God kept His promise?

Does the King James Bible say "Passover" in Acts 12:4?

Do you think the Lord cared enough about His holy words to preserve them in a book His own children can read and believe today?

Video transcript - They were hired to make a mininal revision, but ended up replacing the entire New Testament text.

Modern Bibles remove four important words that clarify an entire doctrine about Jesus being God and man. See for yourself.

Examples of verses that should show Jesus divinity, but have been watered down in modern Bibles. Does your Bible change the great prophecies of Jesus, only to use wording that suggests he had a beginning and is not eternal? If so, buy a new one.

For centuries, Christians have found in their Bibles that Jesus is God, eternally existent, without beginning or end.

Video transcript - By removing a single word, many Bibles record Jesus as lying to his brothers. How can He then be the perfect sacrifice for sin?

Modern scholars argue that we should dump the KJV, and it's Classical English, for an "easier-to-read" Bible. But what if the modern Bibles change important doctrines by removing the Classical English words that tell the reader exactly what God wants him or her to know?

For over 70 years, the Russian government held what many believed to be the oldest Bible in existence: the Codex Sinaiticus. Thought to be the archaeological discovery of a generation, they surprisingly sold it in 1933. New evidence indicates that they may have discovered something suspicious about it.

Many people believe the Bible came from the Roman Catholic Church. Find out the true origin of the Bible.

How can you say the Catholic Church hid the Bible, when the first printed Bible (Gutenberg's) was a Roman Catholic Bible?

Gail Riplinger answers this question.

No, but that doesn't mean that God didn't guide them. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

Why the King James translators rejected the Apocrypha, placing it BETWEEN the testaments, not in them.

The King James translators already had examples of the so-called "new" manuscripts of today, and they REJECTED them. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp

From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp." What are the Dead Sea Scrolls? Do they disagree with the Bible?

Many modern scholars say "Of course I believe the Bible is the inspired word of God, in the original autographs!" But they don't believe what you think they believe.

Some say, "No, let's quickly baptize babies into the church. No need for faith before baptism."

Be careful! Your Bible may not say so, opening the door to infant baptism. What does your Bible say?

Would you trust this man to translate the Bible?

The meaning has changed. To "replenish" means to fill. Adam and Eve were told only to "fill" the earth, not "refill" it.

It has gotten so weird in the last 150 years that in order to say that you believe in the Bible, you have to say, "I believe in the verbal, plenary, infallible, inerrancy of the original autographs."

If you trust text critics, the original gospel had no bodily resurrection! So why trust them?

Did you know there are really only two Bibles? There are hundreds of versions, but only two Bibles.

There was no such region as 'Palestine' when the Bible was written. Attempting to 'modernize' the Bible leads to confusion.

In the early 1990s, New Testament 'scholar', Kirsopp Lake, spent more time examining Codex Sinaiticus than pretty much anybody. Did his time with this 'ancient' document lead to faith?

The Jews rejected it as part of their Scripture (the Old Testament). But the push continues to add it to the KJV.

The NKJV is not a revision of the King James Bible at all. There is a subtle and deadly poison injected into the NKJV: it changes the meaning of God's words and it lifts up other texts that disagree with the King James

Beware of the move to insert ancient legends into the Scriptures.

Does it say that Christ`s resurrection and Great Commission were missing from the "originals?" What is left of Christian faith?

Little-known true story from Wycliffe translators points out a danger in many modern Bibles.

Riplinger points out that the new versions remove Jesus Christ because, "The religions of the world believe that ‘god' created all things but not by Jesus Christ."

If your church believes only in the reliability of originals that we no longer have, it confesses faith in a Bible that does not exist.

Why do some great Christian leaders like to point to "errors" in the King James Bible? From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp copright 1989. Reproduced by permission.

The vast majority of Bible manuscripts support the King James, except for the two corrupted ones used to change modern Bibles.

For years, Satan has made peopple doubt they really have God's words. How is he doing it?

Dr. Frank Logsdon, who wrote the preface for the New American Standard Version, repudiates his work on the NASB.

How can you claim unity when you don't even share the same faith?

How often have we wanted revenge and deserved a rebuke from the Lord? So wouldn`t it be helpful to know what Jesus said when He rebuked the disciples for wanting to "kill somebody?"

See how Bart Ehrman's Christian college professors convinced him that the Scripture was not really God's words after all.

Glossary of terms and important people used in article on I John 5:7 from "Answers To Your Bible Version Questions" by David W. Daniels.

Are the Scriptures just the "ideas" of God, or are they the very WORDS of God? You decide!

The fascinating history of the "Gunpowder Plot" which was supposed to prevent the production of the English Bible authorized by King James.

God has preserved His words through the broad flow of history in certain specific languages: Hebrew, Greek, Old Latin and English. Other languages have the blessed opportunity to follow what God has revealed and translate it into their languages.

There have only been two modifications of the King James Bible. Find out what they are.

Careful examination of early editions of the King James Bible show corrections of spelling and printer's errors, but no true revision.

Jesus said that a man would be known by his fruits. Apparently this also applies to Bibles.

The Textus Receptus didn't appear until 1633 so how can the King James Bible, which was translated in 1611, be translated from it?

Answer: Down through history, God chose several languages to communicate His message.

The key is to show them how the broad evidence of history tells us which Greek text is correct. It then becomes easy to know which Bible we can trust.

It starts with taking some of God's words "out." Then you add some of man's words "in." See how it can change a basic doctrine.

In Washington, DC, the Museum of the Bible has a display containing fragments of what was labeled the Dead Sea Scrolls. Some scholars have questioned the history (provenance) of the fragments. Now, other "ancient Bibles" without provenance are being questioned, like ...Sinaiticus.

An accurate ruler is vital when precise measurements are needed. How much more important is it for us to have an approved standard when it comes to God’s Word and the Bible.

There are no mistakes in the KJV

Video transcript - When he preaches "but the Greek says" he is really just giving an alternate translation of the Greek.

When you begin to disciple a new Christian, don't you always tell him that the Bible is God's word and he can trust it above all else? Of course you do.

Video transcript - By teaching the inspiration of only the "Original Autographs" (which no longer exist), they teach students they don't have a reliable Bible they can trust.

David Daniels takes you through a simple test to check if your Bible is missing anything. Warning: the facts may be shocking!

What you should know when shopping for a new Bible.

Video transcript - If I got saved reading the NIV, why should I leave it?

Are we wasting this precious resource from God?

It's easy to see the change in people when they begin reading God's preserved words, the King James Bible

Many modern Bibles still contain the "fundamentals" but in a weaker state. How many times can you weaken a doctrine before you hurt faith? From 'The Answer Book' copyright 1989 by Samuel Gipp

By leaving out one little word, translators of many Bibles turn one of Jesus` statements into a lie. What difference a little word makes!

When Satan failed to wipe out the Christiains, he attacked the Bible using one simple lie. It's working.

Video transcript - Don't you think the Devil would want to change (or currupt) God's Words?

Removing one little line in Greek takes away from the divinity of Christ.

Video transcript - Are those who read only the King James stupid and uneducated?

1 John 5:7 belongs in the King James Bible and was preserved by faithful Christians. But the passage was removed from many Greek manuscripts, because of the problems it seemed to cause.

Why do so many modern Bibles remove hell? Does it make the translators "uncomfortable?"

Isn't Isaiah 53:4 a mistranslation? Shouldn't "grief" and "sorrows" have been translated "pain" and "suffering?"

It's amusing when someone who believes the Bible to be inerrant is called a "heretic" for believing so.

By putting the words into the footnotes, publishers make the reader think 1) they did not really belong in the Bible and 2) they are not really important.

Just look at the differences between the KJV and the NIV.

Video transcript - How a one-verse change led to the creation of a modern cult with thousands of followers world-wide.

Do you see a difference between these two Bible versions?

Isn't the Holy Spirit incorrectly called "it" in Romans 8:26 in the KJV?

Are the accusers right that it is translated wrong? Or is this just one more lie Satan has cooked up about the KJV?

Are only the originals inspired, or did God preserve a completely accurate Bible text for us?

Author David W Daniels refutes King James Bible translation errors discussed on a radio show by Dr. Robert A Morey.

The Lamsa Bible is not Christian at all. It is Lamsa's own blend of occultic ideas made to look a lot like the King James Bible.

A century after Christ there was a man named Marcion. He pretended to be a Christian, but his beliefs did not match the Bible.

The ads claim the NIV is the best translation available. But can I really trust this Bible?

Every false religion cooked up by Satan downgrades Jesus one way or another. So, what do the new Bible versions (including the Jehovah's Witness Bible) do with Jesus?

pending

Recommendations from David W. Daniels if you are looking for an interlinear Bible text.

A recent issue of a national Christian magazine carried an article about a young man who lost faith in the Bible while in Bible school and now considers himself a "happy agnostic."

From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.- Isn't 'Easter' in Acts 12:4 a mistranslation of the word 'pascha' and should it be translated as 'passover'?

Here is the history. Which side are YOU on?

Publishers have changed the notes in the Scofield Bible until it no longer should carry his name. It carries notes he NEVER wrote

Video transcript - The publisher said the NKJV is a "transition Bible" to help you move to a modern version. It is not intended to be a "modern" KJV.

The common practice of changing God's words is like daring God to deliver on his promise of curses for those who do.

See how this speaker accurately predicted in 1969, how the Bible would be changed to prepare for a new world religion. His accuracy is eerie!

Some Bibles (including the Jehovah's Witness Bible) say he is one, some say the other. These are not the same! Which is right?

Can one tiny word lower the position of Jesus Christ?

A famous occultist reveals how the King James Bible is hindering the New World Order.

For over 300 years, it was not only the standard for God's word in English, but it also standardized the English language.

Gregory Bruner found himself in a Florida prison, serving a ten-year sentence for manslaughter. But he wasn't the same man that he was when he committed the crime that sent him there.

David Daniels, a trained linguist conversant in Greek and Hebrew, had just read Gail Riplinger's book New Age Bible Versions.

What happened when a Christian linguist saw why he could trust the King James Bible.

When examined individually, small changes in modern Bibles may appear small and possibly insignificant. However, the total effect can be seen as working against God’s character, His reputation, and His divinity.

Would you rather your friends read a Bible that God has clearly blessed, or one He has clearly cursed?

How a simple Bible word change thrust Mary into the limelight... a goddess in her own right.

Don`t like what the Bible says? Just choose one that justifies your sin!

According to a recent Associated Press release, the worldwide Anglican church is struggling for "survival."

'Obedience' has been substituted for 'belief.' Changing one word substitutes a behavior (work) for trust (faith). Catholicism is based on "doing things" to get to heaven.

Recent polls show that, although 71 percent of adults nationwide believe in hell, they don't want to hear about it.

If you're not really sure what the Bible teaches (because there are so many translations), why change your life based upon it?

Does your Bible study play multiple "choice?"

Video transcript - Can we only understand the Bible with the help of scholars? But they can't even agree on what the Bible says!

Excerpt taken from 'Why They Changed the Bible', pages 18-19.

Two high schools in Maryland are scheduling a pilot course on the 'history and culture' of homosexuality. The Montgomery County Board of Education unanimously approved the development of the curriculum to be offered in the spring semester.

What if you could buy a Bible with your own church`s doctrines written between its pages? The helps in study Bibles often contain a doctrinal slant.

Here, excerpted from "The Answer Book" on Bible translations by Dr. Samuel Gipp, is an interesting and thought-provoking approach to this question.

A new Bible translation in England is so radical that it would not be worth mentioning if it were not being promoted by high Anglican officials.

Small changes in the wording of the Scriptures can often result in major changes in meaning.

Satan keeps chipping away at God’s words. His goal is a watered-down Bible that offers no defense against the coming one-world religion.

As new Bibles cut out small bits here, a verse there, they diminish the resurrection of Jesus, the miracle of the Exodus and the deity of Christ. The result is a slow ‘corrosion’ of biblical faith.

A new Danish Bible has been attacked for removing the word 'Israel' from many verses. This is a classic example of people posing as translators, who introduce their own interpretation into the scripture.

This new "gospel" is valuable, not because it carries more truth about Jesus, but because it sheds more light on how the Gnostics had perverted the true gospel.

Why were the words he was reading different than the ones his pastor was saying?

That`s right... 1200 hundred of them.

After years of research and collaboration, Humberto Gomez has produced a Spanish Bible version faithful to the originals that formed the KJV, yet maintaining the linguistic beauty of the RV.

God's perfect words (unchanged, nothing removed, nothing added) are now available to the Spanish-speaking world.

New RVG Bible corrects the problems of the Reina Valera and provides a completely accurate Bible in Spanish.

Discovery of more scrolls near the Dead Sea continue to show that the Bible is historically correct.

The new version, called "Today's NIV" or TNIV for short, is supposedly a "gender-accurate" version of the NIV Bible.

"But does it all really matter," one might ask, "if I can support what I believe with the NIV?"

"We, today, are living at a time when the attacks upon Jesus Christ find no equal in history..."

The Statements of Faith of some major Christian organizations claim that they believe the Bible, but wait until you read the small print!

Can just one Greek letter change the gospel from God-centered to man-centered? You are about to find out.

Jesuits have been influencing Bible societies and Bible translation projects, succeeding in shifting the Bible text to accommodate Roman Catholic dogma and the push for 'unity'.

Enough doctrinal changes have been made to God's Word that the Pope can now urge his people to read the 'Bible.'

Preachers all over the world are telling their congregations, "This book in my hands is NOT the Bible!"

The entire discussion on Bible versions rests on one central question. Did God continue to preserve his words after the original autographs were lost?

Confusion over Bible versions leads many Protestants to consider prayer to Mary.

Modern Bibles must change the text to qualify for copyright.

Gail Riplinger's new book, "Which Bible Is God's Word?" contains answers to common questions concerning modern versions and translations.

If your church believes only the "original autographs" were inspired, then they are recommending a Bible that you cannot buy, or hold in your hand. It doesn`t exist today.

There is now little fear by British Roman Catholic leaders in England in pushing Bible readings, since the reader is likely to be reading a Catholic-friendly Bible.

Receiving the pope's recognition as a person of "unblemished character" who has "promoted the interests of society, the [Catholic] Church and the Holy See [Vatican]."

Many popular Spanish Bibles, including the RVR, have word changes that teach salvation by "obedience" instead of purely by faith. That`s Catholic doctrine!

Author Emanuel Rodriguez explains in his new book, 'God's Bible in Spanish,' that the RVG 2010 is simply a revision of the beloved Reina-Valera used by God for over 400 years.

Recent research uncovers hidden details of the plot to publicly discredit the Bible and create basic doubt of God`s words.

Satan tried to stamp out the Bible and failed. So he developed a new plan . . . fix it! Here is how it works.

Modern Bibles have downplayed the awfulness of sin. The result... many churches are teaching that conversion is a process rather than an event.

Specific reasons why we know this refers to Satan.

Here is why "Gehenna" correctly translated "hell" in the King James Bible.

No, it's not true. The words in their widest use simply refer to a witch or a sorcerer. Here's why.

Can God be pleased when we dare to scorn the Bible that proved its power during 400 years of expansion of the Kingdom of God?

Video transcript - Should we dump the King James Bible because of "archaic words", or should we just learn them?

How can we keep Jesus' words if they have been changed? From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp - copyright 1989.

Look at this list of doctrines we must be willing to compromise if we don't care which Bible we read. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

The Sinaitucus has several writers and correctors, apocryphal writings, and contradictions. How do you decide which parts to accept as Scripture, and which parts to reject?

Since the beginning of the world, God has spoken His words and 'someone' has tried to call Him a liar. Who is that someone and what is he up to today?

Fascinated by the spirit world, Hort and Westcott had to be careful their 'ghost chasing' did not become too public.

Writing that his father had a lifelong "faith in what for lack of a better name, one must call Spiritualism," the son of famed biblical Greek text editor B. F. Westcott admits to considerable public alarm at his father's activity.

Examines the two streams of Bible text, and how to choose the right one.

The 100-year war over which text is really God's Word. From 'Understandable History of the Bible' by Samuel C. Gipp

The next time you open your Bible, consider what you hold. Do you know that you hold God’s words perfectly preserved and passed down? Words that were translated through the tireless diligence of the best scholars using the most well-preserved manuscripts? Modern-day publishers and scholars have run a smear campaign against the KJV Bible by claiming their translations to be superior. They state that the KJV is impossible to understand and modern translations are needed.

Do you want a Bible translation that tells you what God 'said,' or one that tells you what the translator believes God 'meant?' Formal equivalence versus dynamic equivalence explained.

Do you want to know exactly what the instructions say, or will you trust the second translator's ability to understand the author's intent and not lead you astray?

Sometimes the simplest things we notice teach us the biggest lessons. Does Sinaiticus, the 'World's Oldest Bible', have the fingerprints of a fake?

Transcript from a video interview between Jack McElroy and David W. Daniels on the problems with the Geneva Bible.

Why do the four gospels attribute three different sentences to Christ as his last?

King James was faced with a conflict. The Puritans wanted a new, correct Bible. But the Anglican church was quite happy with their Bishops' Bible. James had an idea. The churches of the opposing groups would select their best scholars to work together to agree on a single text. That way neither group could write its own viewpoint into the translation. If it tried, the opposing group would shoot it down. What a brilliant way to force the translators to ignore their personal opinions and to just translate precisely, meaning for meaning, nothing added.

The popes have always had a different Bible. The Reformation broke their stranglehold. But they have continued to scheme by destroying trust in God's words.

Here is why the New King James was made, according to an eyewitness.

Dr. Kirk DeVietro, who was present at the introduction of the New King James, tells us how the publishers admitted the real reason they made the NKJV.

Was Jesus married? Who are you going to trust? The eyewitnesses!

The NIV is proof that some people can't leave bad enough alone. The first NIV actually got something right. Now Zondervan has "fixed" it with an outrageous change.

The detailed system used to prevent anyone from imposing his own opinion upon the translation. From "Answers To Your Bible Version Questions" by David W. Daniels.

Fill in the blank!

Many sincere Christians carry this Bible without realizing what's missing!

They couldn't destroy it, so now they are trying to take credit for it.

Tischendorf's story about finding Codex Sinaiticus in a wastebasket is really false. Here is why.

Was Erasmus a "good" Roman Catholic, or a rebel committed to giving the Scriptures to the common man?

Two modern Bibles removed a single word, and present Jesus as a sinner.

Here is the sworn enemy who made the accusation, and why.

Video transcript - An answer to the claims that King James was a homosexual.

The Answer Book, was written by Dr. Samuel Gipp in response to the dozens of questions used by critics of the King James Bible.

Should italicized words in the King James Bible be removed because they were not in the original text?

They were Bible believers from both Anglican and Puritan churches. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp copyright 1989. Reproduced by permisson.

The unbiblical views of Westcott and Hort, that should have disqualified them from preparing a Bible text. From Gipp's "Understandable History of the Bible."

Part 3: How the globalist and darwinian views of Westcott and Hort shaped their approach to the Bible. From Gipp's "Understandable History of the Bible."

Every day, millions of precious people, hungry for God`s forgiveness of their sins, line up to confess their thoughts and failings to a priest.

Just because you don't kow the answer doesn't mean there isn't one. We have to trust that God preserved His Word just the way He wanted it. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp.

If people can't understand the King James, isn't it better to have them read the NIV over nothing at all?

Often humorous examples of mistakes preachers make using their Greek to correct the King James.

Isn't the 21st Century King James Bible supposed to be an exact reprint of the original 1611 version but with archaic words replaced for the closest modern word? Can it be trusted?

To understand why there are so many new Bible versions, just follow the money.

Only when you chart the 65 Bible translations as I have, does the damage become clear. Why would they remove this doctrine?

From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

The history of the Septuagint shows it to be an attempt to replace the preserved text of the Bible with a corrupt Alexandrian text, including the Apocrypha.

From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp - What is the difference between a 'Textus Receptus Man' and a 'King James Man?

Record of the Septuagint (LXX) comes from a single, supposedly ancient letter. Gipp shows why the story is a fraud.

One person's voice, and leaders willing to listen, set this church on a path of soul-winning.

Once upon a time there was a missionary in a far-off land...

See some of what has been added or removed from these Catholic Bibles.

If God wrote only one Book, what's the problem with trusting and submitting to that one Book?

Is the Bible God's absolute yardstick, or just His recommendation?

Video transcript - The New King James is a "transition Bible," meant to pull you away from the King James to one of the modern versions.

Doesn't it just modernize the words of the King James Bible? Why should I read the King James and not the helpful New King James?

Proverbs 30:5-6 declares: "Every word of God is pure… Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." That includes adding or subtracting. (See Revelation 22:18-19.)

As it became clear that modern Bibles remove or change many verses, it begs the question: is this intentional? Is it a conspiracy to change the Bible? All it took was careful research to find the truth!

Many people in our congregations are impressed with preachers who refer to the Greek or Hebrew in their sermons.

When someone says that they are consulting 'the Greek' to interpret a scripture, we need to ask, 'Which one?'

The Battle Cry Editor recently sat down with David W. Daniels, author of several books on the Bible version issue. Here is the interview...

There are two kinds of manuscripts...Accurate and corrupted.

A description of the two streams of Bible manuscripts.

The series of English Bibles that led up to the translation of the King James Version. How we can recognize God's endorsement of the KJV.

It was In the available Antiochian manuscripts. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp.

Researches found the KJV still used by the majority of those who actually read their Bibles.

You can know which Bible to trust. A quick look at history will make the choice obvious.

So which words are Jesus` words? Every single word of the Bible! The Bible is God`s words to us.

In spite of the overwhelming evidence in Scripture of the outcome of David's dramatic defeat of Goliath, The New International Version, 1984 US edition, couldn't get it right.

"Hell" is an uncomfortable word. Everybody knows what it means.

Do the new Bible versions soften the reality of hell?

Our thanks to Rev. D.A. Waite, who gives us this simple explanation in his book, Defending the King James Bible.

He was a defender of the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible.

The fact that Joseph was not the father of Jesus, is a central belief of all who base their faith on the Bible.

The purpose of translating the King James Bible was to give the Scriptures to the common man. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel Gipp.

Here are the highly qualified translators of the King James Bible.

A brief overview of the views of Brook Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, who created the text used in modern Bibles.

Since the Catholic Church claims to have given the world the Bible, Pope Francis has felt free to suggest some changes to the Lord's Prayer he feels will 'improve' it.

For anyone who wishes to honestly consult God’s opinion on the practice of homosexuality, these scriptures, including the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, leave very little doubt.

The accounts of Jesus' lineage in Matthew and Luke are different. Here's why this is not a contradiction.

The italics usually are a simple way of telling us when the word in English is not in the Hebrew or the Greek.

Why is it that most bible versions (non-KJV) either omit Mark 16:9-20 or they have footnotes about alternative endings?

In almost every language but Modern English, people knew whether the speaker was addressing one person or many.

The fact is that the word "corn" comes from a word, meaning "grain" and related to "kernel."

Why does Romans 8:16, 26 refer to the Holy Spirit as an "it" and not a "he", like is found in other parts of Scripture?

Should Hebrew use a masculine or feminine noun for the Holy Spirit?

The translators of the KJV used the term "Jehovah" only under strict circumstances, and for good reason.

Why not make a Bible out of just the 'world's oldest Bible' Codex Sinaiticus? Here's why you haven’t, and probably never will, see one.

Author gives three examples of why he will stay with his tried-and-true King James Bible.

Here are the clear reasons for the difference.

Despite stories to the contrary, King James, in no uncertain terms, clearly authorized the translation of the Bible that now bears his name.

Scripture memorization is a lost art.

Video transcript - Why did God bless an English translation? What about other languages?

Passover is not the correct translation of pascha in this single New Testament passage.

Here's how Luke tells us that any manuscript missing the bodily ascension of Jesus is a fraud.

There are really only two sides to the Bible version issue. One is the plot that Satan has hatched to use counterfeit manuscripts to create the new bibles. The other side is the fact that the reputation of the preserved words of God in the King James Bible in English has been intentionally and seriously damaged.

Why does the KJV translate "theopneustos" in 2 Ti. 3:16 as "inspired" rather than "God-breathed"

Chick Publications endorses Spanish Reina Valera Gomez Spanish Bible.

Why would God bother to inspire the original manuscripts if He wasn't going to preserve His words?

A Christian band member shook his world. He announced that he no longer believes in God: 'Once I found that I didn’t believe the Bible was the perfect Word of God, it didn't take long to realize that I was no longer sure he was there at all.' Where did he go wrong?

If Jack would have given in to pressure and decided to use modern versions, some of his tracts might have been quite different than what we have today.

The people in the U.S. are a nation of "drifters," according to a recent report by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

One of the best kept secrets today is that unbelievers with ulterior motives were involved in the “translation” of the modern Bibles. But they have been trusted to change the Bible just because they were called “scholars.”

You won't believe what these seminary professors taught to their students. Watch how they tear down faith.

Today, pastors are pressured to change their churches in order to grow. If they want to attract the multitudes, they must change the music, the seats, the sermon ... and of course, the Bible they use.

In a recent email to Chick Publications, Michael R. has suggested a very enlightening Bible drill to be used in a youth group.