Video transcript - If God preserved His words in some form, does He need to do it in that form again? If He preserved His words in English in the KJV, does He need to retranslate it every few years?

Is it possible one of the two pillars supporting the modern, billion-dollar Bible industry is a counterfeit?

HIstory shows that God revealed Himself to man in one language at a time. Those were then translated. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

Description of the texts used to bring us the Bible. Excerpted from "Understandable History of the Bible" by Samuel C. Gipp.

People argued that the last part of the Gospel of Mark should be removed since it’s not in miniscule 2427, believed to be the oldest. Then scientific evidence proved it was a hoax.

The new NIV Bible translation, the TNIV, has finally gotten Bible scholars' attention to God's words.

From 'Understandable History of the Bible' by Samuel C. Gipp - How the Roman Catholic Church fought against the Authorized Text.

Do you think the Lord cared enough about His holy words to preserve them in a book His own children can read and believe today?

Many people believe the Bible came from the Roman Catholic Church. Find out the true origin of the Bible.

Gail Riplinger answers this question.

Why the King James translators rejected the Apocrypha, placing it BETWEEN the testaments, not in them.

The King James translators already had examples of the so-called "new" manuscripts of today, and they REJECTED them. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp

From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp." What are the Dead Sea Scrolls? Do they disagree with the Bible?

If you trust text critics, the original gospel had no bodily resurrection! So why trust them?

The NKJV is not a revision of the King James Bible at all. There is a subtle and deadly poison injected into the NKJV: it changes the meaning of God's words and it lifts up other texts that disagree with the King James

Does it say that Christ`s resurrection and Great Commission were missing from the "originals?" What is left of Christian faith?

If your church believes only in the reliability of originals that we no longer have, it confesses faith in a Bible that does not exist.

God has preserved His words through the broad flow of history in certain specific languages: Hebrew, Greek, Old Latin and English. Other languages have the blessed opportunity to follow what God has revealed and translate it into their languages.

There have only been two modifications of the King James Bible. Find out what they are.

Careful examination of early editions of the King James Bible show corrections of spelling and printer's errors, but no true revision.

The Textus Receptus didn't appear until 1633 so how can the King James Bible, which was translated in 1611, be translated from it?

Answer: Down through history, God chose several languages to communicate His message.

The key is to show them how the broad evidence of history tells us which Greek text is correct. It then becomes easy to know which Bible we can trust.

An accurate ruler is vital when precise measurements are needed. How much more important is it for us to have an approved standard when it comes to God’s Word and the Bible.

Video transcript - By teaching the inspiration of only the "Original Autographs" (which no longer exist), they teach students they don't have a reliable Bible they can trust.

Video transcript - Are those who read only the King James stupid and uneducated?

1 John 5:7 belongs in the King James Bible and was preserved by faithful Christians. But the passage was removed from many Greek manuscripts, because of the problems it seemed to cause.

"Did God really preserve His Word for us today?" This question is central to all Bible version arguments.

Are only the originals inspired, or did God preserve a completely accurate Bible text for us?

The ads claim the NIV is the best translation available. But can I really trust this Bible?

A recent issue of a national Christian magazine carried an article about a young man who lost faith in the Bible while in Bible school and now considers himself a "happy agnostic."

Would you rather your friends read a Bible that God has clearly blessed, or one He has clearly cursed?

Don`t like what the Bible says? Just choose one that justifies your sin!

According to a recent Associated Press release, the worldwide Anglican church is struggling for "survival."

A new Bible translation in England is so radical that it would not be worth mentioning if it were not being promoted by high Anglican officials.

This new "gospel" is valuable, not because it carries more truth about Jesus, but because it sheds more light on how the Gnostics had perverted the true gospel.

God's perfect words (unchanged, nothing removed, nothing added) are now available to the Spanish-speaking world.

Enough doctrinal changes have been made to God's Word that the Pope can now urge his people to read the 'Bible.'

The entire discussion on Bible versions rests on one central question. Did God continue to preserve his words after the original autographs were lost?

Examines the two streams of Bible text, and how to choose the right one.

The 100-year war over which text is really God's Word. From 'Understandable History of the Bible' by Samuel C. Gipp

Transcript from a video interview between Jack McElroy and David W. Daniels on the problems with the Geneva Bible.

They couldn't destroy it, so now they are trying to take credit for it.

Tischendorf's story about finding Codex Sinaiticus in a wastebasket is really false. Here is why.

Video transcript - An answer to the claims that King James was a homosexual.

They were Bible believers from both Anglican and Puritan churches. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp copyright 1989. Reproduced by permisson.

Jesus frequently referred to "the scriptures" as he taught the disciples and conversed with the Pharisees.

Record of the Septuagint (LXX) comes from a single, supposedly ancient letter. Gipp shows why the story is a fraud.

There are two kinds of manuscripts...Accurate and corrupted.

A description of the two streams of Bible manuscripts.

The series of English Bibles that led up to the translation of the King James Version. How we can recognize God's endorsement of the KJV.

It was In the available Antiochian manuscripts. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp.

You can know which Bible to trust. A quick look at history will make the choice obvious.

He was a defender of the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible.

The purpose of translating the King James Bible was to give the Scriptures to the common man. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel Gipp.

Since the Catholic Church claims to have given the world the Bible, Pope Francis has felt free to suggest some changes to the Lord's Prayer he feels will 'improve' it.

Why is it that most bible versions (non-KJV) either omit Mark 16:9-20 or they have footnotes about alternative endings?

Video transcript - Why did God bless an English translation? What about other languages?

A Christian band member shook his world. He announced that he no longer believes in God: 'Once I found that I didn’t believe the Bible was the perfect Word of God, it didn't take long to realize that I was no longer sure he was there at all.' Where did he go wrong?