A Message From Jack Chick

Video transcript - If God preserved His words in some form, does He need to do it in that form again? If He preserved His words in English in the KJV, does He need to retranslate it every few years?

What if there really ARE mistakes in the King James Bible?

Answer to the charge

Aren't there archaic words in the Bible needing modern translation?

Description of the texts used to bring us the Bible. Excerpted from "Understandable History of the Bible" by Samuel C. Gipp.

Dr. Frank Logsdon, project member of the translation committee for the New American Standard Version (NASB), has denounced his work on that Bible and urged all Christians to return to the Authorized Version, commonly known as the King James Bible.

Are there good reasons why we should be concerned about the proliferation of Bible versions, or is it "much ado about nothing?"

Author David W. Daniels Tells How the NASB Influenced Him in Bible College.

The Bible contains some quotations that are actually translations into Hebrew or Greek from other languages. Are they inspired Scripture? From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp copyright 1989. Reproduced by permission.

There are two kinds of Bible scholars: the scholars of faith and the scholars of doubt. Which one will YOU trust?

From 'Understandable History of the Bible' by Samuel C. Gipp - How the Roman Catholic Church fought against the Authorized Text.

Meet the men whose disbelief compelled them to change the Bible - Westcott and Hort. See the heresy in their own words, and why they were determined to change the text of the Scriptures. From Gipp's "Understandable History of the Bible."

"Coming out" as a lesbian, she says she is not really convinced that the Bible speaks against homosexuality because not all Bibles do so clearly.

Ezra was presented with the perfect opportunity to update the Bible. Rather, he did what every faithful pastor should be doing.

Is your bible the perfect word of God?

Excerpt from chapter 9 of "Understandable History of the Bible" by Samuel C. Gipp.

Whether to use the King James or a modern Bible depends upon a simple decision. It boils down to one basic choice - do you believe God kept His promise?

Video transcript - They were hired to make a mininal revision, but ended up replacing the entire New Testament text.

No, but that doesn't mean that God didn't guide them. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

The King James translators already had examples of the so-called "new" manuscripts of today, and they REJECTED them. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp

Many modern scholars say "Of course I believe the Bible is the inspired word of God, in the original autographs!" But they don't believe what you think they believe.

The meaning has changed. To "replenish" means to fill. Adam and Eve were told only to "fill" the earth, not "refill" it.

It has gotten so weird in the last 150 years that in order to say that you believe in the Bible, you have to say, "I believe in the verbal, plenary, infallible, inerrancy of the original autographs."

Little-known true story from Wycliffe translators points out a danger in many modern Bibles.

If your church believes only in the reliability of originals that we no longer have, it confesses faith in a Bible that does not exist.

The vast majority of Bible manuscripts support the King James, except for the two corrupted ones used to change modern Bibles.

For years, Satan has made peopple doubt they really have God's words. How is he doing it?

Dr. Frank Logsdon, who wrote the preface for the New American Standard Version, repudiates his work on the NASB.

See how Bart Ehrman's Christian college professors convinced him that the Scripture was not really God's words after all.

The Textus Receptus didn't appear until 1633 so how can the King James Bible, which was translated in 1611, be translated from it?

Answer: Down through history, God chose several languages to communicate His message.

Video transcript - When he preaches "but the Greek says" he is really just giving an alternate translation of the Greek.

Video transcript - Are those who read only the King James stupid and uneducated?

1 John 5:7 belongs in the King James Bible and was preserved by faithful Christians. But the passage was removed from many Greek manuscripts, because of the problems it seemed to cause.

Isn't Isaiah 53:4 a mistranslation? Shouldn't "grief" and "sorrows" have been translated "pain" and "suffering?"

It's amusing when someone who believes the Bible to be inerrant is called a "heretic" for believing so.

Video transcript - How a one-verse change led to the creation of a modern cult with thousands of followers world-wide.

Isn't the Holy Spirit incorrectly called "it" in Romans 8:26 in the KJV?

Are only the originals inspired, or did God preserve a completely accurate Bible text for us?

Author David W Daniels refutes King James Bible translation errors discussed on a radio show by Dr. Robert A Morey.

Recommendations from David W. Daniels if you are looking for an interlinear Bible text.

From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.- Isn't 'Easter' in Acts 12:4 a mistranslation of the word 'pascha' and should it be translated as 'passover'?

See how this speaker accurately predicted in 1969, how the Bible would be changed to prepare for a new world religion. His accuracy is eerie!

A famous occultist reveals how the King James Bible is hindering the New World Order.

When examined individually, small changes in modern Bibles may appear small and possibly insignificant. However, the total effect can be seen as working against God’s character, His reputation, and His divinity.

Don`t like what the Bible says? Just choose one that justifies your sin!

If you're not really sure what the Bible teaches (because there are so many translations), why change your life based upon it?

Video transcript - Can we only understand the Bible with the help of scholars? But they can't even agree on what the Bible says!

Excerpt taken from 'Why They Changed the Bible', pages 18-19.

What if you could buy a Bible with your own church`s doctrines written between its pages? The helps in study Bibles often contain a doctrinal slant.

As new Bibles cut out small bits here, a verse there, they diminish the resurrection of Jesus, the miracle of the Exodus and the deity of Christ. The result is a slow ‘corrosion’ of biblical faith.

A new Danish Bible has been attacked for removing the word 'Israel' from many verses. This is a classic example of people posing as translators, who introduce their own interpretation into the scripture.

Why were the words he was reading different than the ones his pastor was saying?

That`s right... 1200 hundred of them.

"But does it all really matter," one might ask, "if I can support what I believe with the NIV?"

The Statements of Faith of some major Christian organizations claim that they believe the Bible, but wait until you read the small print!

Can just one Greek letter change the gospel from God-centered to man-centered? You are about to find out.

Preachers all over the world are telling their congregations, "This book in my hands is NOT the Bible!"

Modern Bibles must change the text to qualify for copyright.

Many popular Spanish Bibles, including the RVR, have word changes that teach salvation by "obedience" instead of purely by faith. That`s Catholic doctrine!

Here is why "Gehenna" correctly translated "hell" in the King James Bible.

How can we keep Jesus' words if they have been changed? From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp - copyright 1989.

The next time you open your Bible, consider what you hold. Do you know that you hold God’s words perfectly preserved and passed down? Words that were translated through the tireless diligence of the best scholars using the most well-preserved manuscripts? Modern-day publishers and scholars have run a smear campaign against the KJV Bible by claiming their translations to be superior. They state that the KJV is impossible to understand and modern translations are needed.

Do you want a Bible translation that tells you what God 'said,' or one that tells you what the translator believes God 'meant?' Formal equivalence versus dynamic equivalence explained.

Do you want to know exactly what the instructions say, or will you trust the second translator's ability to understand the author's intent and not lead you astray?

Transcript from a video interview between Jack McElroy and David W. Daniels on the problems with the Geneva Bible.

King James was faced with a conflict. The Puritans wanted a new, correct Bible. But the Anglican church was quite happy with their Bishops' Bible. James had an idea. The churches of the opposing groups would select their best scholars to work together to agree on a single text. That way neither group could write its own viewpoint into the translation. If it tried, the opposing group would shoot it down. What a brilliant way to force the translators to ignore their personal opinions and to just translate precisely, meaning for meaning, nothing added.

The NIV is proof that some people can't leave bad enough alone. The first NIV actually got something right. Now Zondervan has "fixed" it with an outrageous change.

The detailed system used to prevent anyone from imposing his own opinion upon the translation. From "Answers To Your Bible Version Questions" by David W. Daniels.

They couldn't destroy it, so now they are trying to take credit for it.

Was Erasmus a "good" Roman Catholic, or a rebel committed to giving the Scriptures to the common man?

The Answer Book, was written by Dr. Samuel Gipp in response to the dozens of questions used by critics of the King James Bible.

Should italicized words in the King James Bible be removed because they were not in the original text?

They were Bible believers from both Anglican and Puritan churches. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp copyright 1989. Reproduced by permisson.

Every day, millions of precious people, hungry for God`s forgiveness of their sins, line up to confess their thoughts and failings to a priest.

Often humorous examples of mistakes preachers make using their Greek to correct the King James.

Isn't the 21st Century King James Bible supposed to be an exact reprint of the original 1611 version but with archaic words replaced for the closest modern word? Can it be trusted?

Once upon a time there was a missionary in a far-off land...

If God wrote only one Book, what's the problem with trusting and submitting to that one Book?

Video transcript - The New King James is a "transition Bible," meant to pull you away from the King James to one of the modern versions.

Proverbs 30:5-6 declares: "Every word of God is pure… Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." That includes adding or subtracting. (See Revelation 22:18-19.)

As it became clear that modern Bibles remove or change many verses, it begs the question: is this intentional? Is it a conspiracy to change the Bible? All it took was careful research to find the truth!

Many people in our congregations are impressed with preachers who refer to the Greek or Hebrew in their sermons.

The series of English Bibles that led up to the translation of the King James Version. How we can recognize God's endorsement of the KJV.

So which words are Jesus` words? Every single word of the Bible! The Bible is God`s words to us.

In spite of the overwhelming evidence in Scripture of the outcome of David's dramatic defeat of Goliath, The New International Version, 1984 US edition, couldn't get it right.

Here are the highly qualified translators of the King James Bible.

A brief overview of the views of Brook Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, who created the text used in modern Bibles.

The italics usually are a simple way of telling us when the word in English is not in the Hebrew or the Greek.

In almost every language but Modern English, people knew whether the speaker was addressing one person or many.

The fact is that the word "corn" comes from a word, meaning "grain" and related to "kernel."

Why does Romans 8:16, 26 refer to the Holy Spirit as an "it" and not a "he", like is found in other parts of Scripture?

Should Hebrew use a masculine or feminine noun for the Holy Spirit?

The translators of the KJV used the term "Jehovah" only under strict circumstances, and for good reason.

Video transcript - Why did God bless an English translation? What about other languages?

Passover is not the correct translation of pascha in this single New Testament passage.

There are really only two sides to the Bible version issue. One is the plot that Satan has hatched to use counterfeit manuscripts to create the new bibles. The other side is the fact that the reputation of the preserved words of God in the King James Bible in English has been intentionally and seriously damaged.

Why does the KJV translate "theopneustos" in 2 Ti. 3:16 as "inspired" rather than "God-breathed"

Why would God bother to inspire the original manuscripts if He wasn't going to preserve His words?

A Christian band member shook his world. He announced that he no longer believes in God: 'Once I found that I didn’t believe the Bible was the perfect Word of God, it didn't take long to realize that I was no longer sure he was there at all.' Where did he go wrong?